You can still act where there’s likelihood of confusion based on overall impression, goods/services, and consumer perception.

Often efficient where intent isn’t malicious—secure undertakings, rebrand timelines, and costs.

Yes—requires local counsel; we coordinate multi-jurisdiction strategy with local partners.

Combine court orders with marketplace watch, customs recordal, and periodic audits.

Courts can order delivery-up & destruction of infringing materials.

File INDRP/UDRP for recovery/transfer, plus civil action if misuse/confusion exists.

You can seek ad policy enforcement and pursue legal remedies if ads cause confusion/passing off.

Yes. With IP proof and correct forms, takedowns often occur within 24–96 hours.

Clean proofs of your use/reputation and clear, dated proofs of the infringer’s use—screens, invoices, samples.

For counterfeits, criminal complaints help seize stock and deter repeat offenders, used alongside civil suits.

With a strong prima facie case and urgency, courts can hear interim injunctions within weeks.

Yes—damages or accounts of profits plus costs; quantum depends on evidence of loss and infringer’s gains.

Often yes, but persistent or malicious infringers may require court orders and/or criminal action.

Courts can grant John Doe/Ashok Kumar orders to act against unknown parties and new aliases.

Registration lets you sue for infringement; without it, you can still sue for passing off if you have strong prior use and goodwill.